When will The Today Show win its Pulitzer?

Every few weeks, it’s worth double checking: Dialing up the NBC News website to double check if they still list The Today Show as a news program.  They do, and each morning Today proudly boasts that it is a production of NBC News.  Maybe one of those infomercial disclaimers about paid programming would be more appropriate.

Today’s top story this morning covered the affairs and the extortion scheme David Letterman admitted to last night.  That’s surely not an aftershock of the bitter divorce between NBC and Letterman back in 1993.  More likely, it’s a thinly veiled attempt to keep the Tonight Show from hemorrhaging viewers to the other show inspired by Johnny Carson.

The next biggest story?  Chicago’s failed bid to land the 2016 Summer Olympic Games.  That’s a lot of free advertising for whoever televises that event – which has been NBC for about 21 years and figures to be NBC again in another seven.

Wizards find one less excuse for losing

The Washington Wizards are streamlining their 250-page playbook – and adding more information at the same time.

At the start of training camp this week, each player received an iPod with a pre-loaded playbook.  In addition to standard diagrams of each play, the iPods were loaded with videos – to demonstrate the plays – and schedule information.  As the season moves along, coaches will use the iPods to distribute scouting reports and other updates.

This use of technology made me think about the applications to political efforts – and reminded me a little bit of the portable DVD players used by Rep.Patrick McHenry when he ran for Congress in 2004. Way back then, door-to-door volunteers delivered video messages from McHenry to voters.  In 2010, those volunteers might be armed with a personal video message, voter history, precinct walking sheets, polling locations,and megabytes of other information which is constantly being updated – literally in the palms of their hands.

Just as all the technology in the world won’t win a campaign without a good message, the Wizards can’t rely on gadgets to crack the 20-win barrier.  But given last year’s results, it can’t hurt.

Why’d you make a commercial like that?

For those of us in the Washington, D.C. media market who spend our evenings enjoying local news followed by the power hour of Wheel of Fortune and Jeopardy, this Creigh Deeds commercial is very familiar:

It is, obviously, an attempt to throw Bob McDonnell’s 20-year-old words back at him – and since Deeds’s other strategy is a crippling inability to give straight answers, the strategy is sound.  This commercial is almost laughably bad, though – and not just for the forced lines, stereotypical feminists, awkward pauses, or the final line – “Why did you vote that way?” – being blurted like a Valley Girl’s question about when the mall opens.

It’s clearly geared toward working women in Northern Virginia, but if all professional women in Northern Virginia were as angry as the women in this commercial appear, there would probably be a lot more men walking around maimed.  The actors are confrontational – which wouldn’t be a problem if the commercial was being watched by McDonnell.

Unless an independent voter already shares their rage, chances are this commercial will not convince them.  A more persuasive – and effective – method of conveying righteous indignation would have been to show these women with families, or to feature younger professionals in their early 20’s.  That would have helped independent audiences to connect with the women.   Their demeanor was way off, as well: media trainers will always suggest you smile whenever you are on camera, because it will help viewers identify with you more.  It’s difficult to identify with someone who is shouting at you.

The Deeds campaign could also have used humor intentionally: “Bob McDonnell’s thesis – A Caveman Could Do It.”  Thay’ve put together a pretty funny commercial as it is – but I don’t think that was the intended effect.

A site called “Funny or Die” shouldn’t be anywhere near healthcare

This snarky “Save the Insurance Companies” PSA featuring Will Ferrell is a hit, at least in terms of its viewership.  .

It’s certainly better than Kicking and Screaming, and it’s makes the point that many on the left are trying to drive home – that insurance companies are greedy leeches who profit from sickness, and that their money should be commandeered to fund publicly administered health insurance plans.

But the Personal Democracy Forum brings up an interesting point about the timing of this video.  Released just this week, the intense health care debate is already pretty mature.  Sarcasm and oversimplifications can help frame the debate, but they are less effective in moving the debate along.

Much like a tardy Ron Burgundy bursting into the Channel 4 newsroom after spending some time in a glass case of emotion, Will Ferrell may be too late to make his point.

In support of Capitalism

There’s no way to protest capitalism like champagne in a penthouse.  That’s how the afterparty for the premiere of Michael Moore’s newest movie, Capitalism: A Love Story supposedly went down.

This stunt invites the typical criticism of Moore: that he’s a hypocrite enamored with the idea of himself as a Hollywood star.  He’s an easy target for ridicule from the right, and his methods are questionable, but that’s not why Moore fails as a filmmaker.  Moore’s shortcoming is in the types of movies he makes.

Ever see Canadian Bacon?  It’s a great movie about the military industrial complex hijacking the US government written and directed by Michael Moore.  There’s a strong anti-military undercurrent if you are looking for social commentary; if you aren’t, it’s just a funny movie that paints the picture of a country bought and sold by military contractors.

Could a similar movie have gotten Moore’s points across better than Bowling for Columbine or Sicko?  Probably – just as a novel is more memorable than a textbook.  Of course, that may not be Moore’s goal.  Perhaps he is trying to be the conscience of Hollywood – the compass which gives direction to other movies which hit the same themes.  In DC, the analogy might be to think tanks like the Heritage Foundation or Center for American Progress supplying research and ideas to political candidates.

Either way, come October 2, Michael Moore’s movie is coming to a theater near you.  I’m looking forward to it.  And the irony of decrying capitalism in a venue which costs $10 in admission will not likely be lost.

“Read the Thesis” means “Read our parts of the Thesis”

In the Commonwealth I currently call home, the fight for Virginia’s governorship is becoming downright Jerseyan thanks to Creigh Deed’s attempt to leverage an old grad school paper written by Bob McDonnell.

Deeds is following an important rule – when negative information is out there about an opponent, the best thing is to keep it alive for as long as possible.  Since the McDonnell thesis is 90 pages long, the Deeds folks have selected the juiciest clips and added their editorial content.  It’s a good way for them to excite a base which is currently unexcited and raise some money.

Missing in a lot of the coverage is a link to the actual thesis.  I had to do about 20 minutes of searching before I found and downloaded McDonnel’s work.  If you haven’t actually read the thesis, it really is heavy on the involvement of church and family, but also has some harsh treatment of federal social programs – such as welfare, which was reformed six years later.

Since few voters will bother to read 90 pages, they may go back to their own memories of writing college papers.  How many people who took political science or current events courses would want their words revisited?   During my time at UMass, the Journalism department offered a class called “The Press and the Third World.”  I took it during my sophomore year, and usually sat next to a friend of mine with whom I worked at the campus radio station’s sports department.  (The class fulfilled a requirement for our major, but we were both aspiring sports journalists.  The subject matter was not in our area of expertise.)  Every Tuesday, our professor would look over the New York Times – what he called the “newspaper of record” for America – and express disgust that the Third World was rarely covered.  And when it was, he would express disgust that the stories would only cover corruption, violence, or the bizarre.

We could have pointed out that the local Springfield, Mass. television stations only covered corruption, violence, or the bizarre in Western Massachusetts, or that regional news outlets usually cover the regions they are based in.  We could have pointed out that his gripe was with media in general, not in American media’s treatment of the Third World.  Actually, one of our classmates brought that up during discussion one day, and was shouted down by other students as the professor encouraged them.  My friend and I shut our mouths, parroted back the professor’s comments when it was time to take a test, accepted our A- grades and went back to WMUA to cover sports.  The content of those papers would be wholly inconsistent with the content of this blog, but the Worker’s World Party might enjoy them.  (Although, I believe I criticized Jon Stewart’s coverage of the Middle East in my final paper.)

With a heavily college-educated voting populace who can identify with the college writing process, McDonnell’s thesis may not have quite the impact that Deeds would hope.

Politics: Showbiz or Sports?

Matt Lewis had a neat post at PoliticsDaily yesterday, talking about how the dreaded “24-hour news cycle” that has (paradoxically) made political discourse more pundit/sound bite-driven has also done the same for sports.

Here is just one example: Recent speculation on ESPN about dissention brewing among Favre’s new Viking teammates (some of whom are loyal to the Vikings’ former quarterback) reminded me of the never-ending leaks that flowed out of the McCain campaign and onto the pages of Politico — usually in regard to Sarah Palin. Be it a campaign or a football team, one disgruntled “unnamed source” can provide a days’ worth of material for cable networks– all of which need to feed a 24-hour news cycle.

A former colleague once called Washington, D.C. “Hollywood for Ugly People” – a town driven by a core industry (electoral politics) with many auxiliary sub-industries (lobbyists, contractors, regulators, think tanks, etc.).  But there’s also a highly competitive streak, just as one might find among professional athletes, but among people who can’t do this.

Instead of show business for the homely, maybe politics is sports for the weak?

We have two more days before Ted rises, so…

When the news broke about Ted Kennedy’s death last week, two things became imminent: 1) A televised re-telling of the Kennedy legend, played out over several days; and 2) a well-crafted obituary that criticized Kennedy imagery, penned by Massachusetts’ own Dan Flynn.

My Mom will enjoy Flynn’s take on Kennedy’s dicey version of Catholicism (that allows de facto divorce), but Flynn also discusses the near-royal status the Kennedy family enjoyed and the changing  policy positions Ted Kennedy embraced throughout his career that signified a lack of substance beyond his last name.  While maintaining a respect for the deceased, Flynn pokes holes in the images that have been all over the TV over the past few days:

The caricature that Ann Richards and others painted of George H.W. Bush — “born on third base and thought that he hit a triple” — more resembled Ted Kennedy, a gregarious rogue enabled by wealth, power, and a famous last name. The privilege that shielded the playboy senator from the consequences of his actions acted as a double-edge sword by ensuring that he also never learned from the mistakes he didn’t suffer from.