Playing two sides against Afghanistan

It’s one thing for a politician to draw criticism for a policy from his opponents, but the reaction to President Obama’s Afghani-plan speech last night from the left is potentially more problematic.

Obama’s speech was unsurprising – not only had his plans for troop escalation been the worst kept secret in Washington for weeks, he promised to do as much during the campaign last year.  Still, pundits like Michael Moore – normally a water boy for all issue blue – have issued strongly worded rebukes against such a strategy.

Moore’s warning, in an open letter, that Obama would “destroy the hopes and dreams so many millions have placed in” him suggests that he wasn’t paying attention to the substance of Obama’s campaign rhetoric.  As a likeable candidate, Obama made it easy for folks like Moore to ignore policy details and revel in the fact that their newest candidate wasn’t a wonkish robot (like Al Gore in 2000) or a New England blue blood (like John Kerry).

Unfortunately for the President, that raises expectations to the level of his follower’s wildest dreams – not a good thing in an environment where success or failure often comes down to the size of the yardstick.

App shoot

Upon reflecting more about recent, high-profile rejections from Apple’s App Store, one thing is becoming apparent: with the iPhone/iPod platform is gaining popularity, more developers are investing time and resources writing software for it only to see their creations rejected.

The closed-door approach makes sense for Apple – since their platform is the first of its kind, any questionable use would reflect back on their highly-recognizable brand rather than an anonymous developer.  If Saturday Night Live legend Garrett Morris developed a game for the iPhone called “Gonna Get Me a Shotgun and Kill all the Whities I See,” Apple would bear the brunt of the protests for allowing it rather than Morris.  (When Morris famously – and hilariously – sang that line on the air in 1976, the NBC switchboard probably got more calls than Morris’s home phone.  By citing the actual sketch, do I avoid somehow being called a racist for quoting it?)

But the closed door has implications for potentially revolutionary uses of mobile technology.  In 2008 a developer created an excellent application for the Obama Campaign, allowing volunteers to prioritize their contacts for get out the vote calls.  If the time and effort invested in creating an app is possibly wasted, how will small, volunteer-driven campaigns for local or Congressional offices – the types of campaigns who could really use the technology – justify exploring the possibilities of the platform?

Quite an enemies list you’re building there…

Ever heard of Edmunds.com?  It’s an information site for prospective car customers.  As businesses looking for free publicity often do, they decided to publicly discuss something which was already making news, releasing an analysis of the Cash-for-Clunkers program that put the per-car cost to taxpayers at $24,000.

The dignified. measured response from the White House to mild criticism from an obscure consumer site?  A point-by-point analysis of the analysis… under the headline “Busy Covering Car Sales on Mars, Edmunds.com Gets It Wrong (Again) on Cash for Clunkers.”

If you’re scoring at home, Fox News is not an officially approved news organization and Edmunds.com is where to buy your Mars rover.  And the White House doesn’t take kindly to made-up numbers… well, usually.

St. Barack of Chicago

An enterprising Reuters photographer – likely with a sense of humor – took this picture of President Obama today:

Obama

The President was speaking about his administration’s programs to help small businesses.  No word on whether he said anything about money-changers.

An image like this is probably not set up on purpose.   The White House communication staff will probably have to spend a little more attention to the sight lines for photographers at future press events.

Although, we probably should not judge them, lest we be judged.

Health care (Astro)Turf wars

Team Obama is not worried about the opposition to their health care overhaul plans.  Robert Gibbs called for Americans to look upon them with a “jaundiced eye” and called the efforts the most derogatory of inside-the-beltway epithets, “AstroTurf” – fake grass roots.  And it’s certainly not uncommon in DC.

But erstwhile Republican Senator Arlen Specter may be surprised by Gibbs’s characterization, as he ran headlong into this opposition…

As did Congressman Lloyd Dogget…

…And Congressman Russ Carnahan….

The Democrats’ answer to these protests are paid radio ads that will be airing in the districts of key Democrats whose support for the President’s health care goals may cost them votes in 2010.  You can listen in here.

So on one side we have upset people confronting their elected representatives.  On the other, we have radio ads produced by a national entity telling voters what’s good for them.  I’m sorry, which one was the fake grassroots?

The guys having the beer already agree

One week ago today, the Cambridge Police Department and Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates released a joint statement, with both sides admitting the professor’s arrest was a “regrettable” escalation, and that dropping the charges of disorderly conduct was a “just resolution” to all sides.  Both sides had kissed and made up when, hours later, the President accused one side of “acting stupidly” – a statement which, while apparently true, was just as apparently incomplete.

Now, someone has lost their job over it. Lee Landor, an aide to Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer, criticized Obama’s criticism on Facebook, stating that arresting officer James Crowley was doing his job.  In another post, she called Sharptonian racial arsonists to task be questioning the idea that all white people in positions of power are evil racists.  According to Stringer’s flack, Landor’s comments “were totally inappropriate and in direct contradiction to the views of the borough president and his office.”  I’m not sure what parts of Cambridge, Mass. fall under the jurisdiction of the Manhattan Borough President, but apparently disagreement on this local issue and the national politics surrounding it constituted an irreconcilable difference.  Landor was forced to resign today (adding one more to the unemployment rolls).

The President will invite Gates and Crowley to the White House so they can make up “officially” and look like a peacemaker.  Crowley will, if he wants it, gain a degree of notoriety as the victim of a witch hunt at the hands of Sharpton and his ilk.  And for a professor who heads a department named after a Marxist who renounced his American citizenship, a racially-tinged flap with the police is a guaranteed moneymaker – Gates could make six figures talking at campuses in the next month and never leave Massachusetts.  Hopefully, Landor can find a way cash in on her involvement in this controversy as well.

Transparent as Mud

The President fielded a question last night that revealed more about the failed expectations than any admissions that health care may not pass by August.  Obama had to duck a tough question from his hometown Chicago Tribune about the lack of transparency in the health care reform process.  It isn’t a new question, either – the President has broken promises to allow public review of pending legislation as well as struggled to maintain a website where citizens could track government spending.

The developing pattern is not good, and looks worse because the President is setting himself up with expectations which are tough to reach.  At best he looks naive; at worst corrupt.

There will be plenty of time for waiting AFTER health care “reform” passes

President Barack Obama takes to the airwaves tonight, hoping that because Americans like him, they will accept an overhaul of the health care system without drawn-out deliberations, debate, and research.  Surely, after the President delivers his address, Republican leaders will answer by talking about the exorbitant cost of government-run health care.

But here’s a better reason to oppose government meddling in health care: it makes health care worse.  If the goal is to make sure that as many people as possible actually get the care they need, this is the wrong way to do it.

Vlogger Steven Crowder makes just this point in a video which, while maybe a little long, is still worth watching: