I’m not even sure what channel Rush Limbaugh is on in DC

Nothing happens by accident in politics. The latest case in point is the flap over Rush Limbaugh.

It started with a seemingly offhand comment by President Obama, chiding Republicans for following the marching orders of the guy who, let’s be honest, has gotten a ton of us interested in Republican politics. In the weeks following, the White House has taken repeated jabs at Limbaugh – to Limbaugh’s delight. In a story published last week that I just stumbled across, Politico reveals that this has been a strategy months in the making. After finding high negative ratings for Rush Limbaugh in October polls, Democrats have been waiting for the right flap to arise and give them a chance to hang Limbaugh around the Republican Party’s neck.

The behind-the-curtain strategy of what seem to be spontaneous events, like this Limbaugh controversy, demonstrates a key value of Washington – that governing is campaigning by other means.

Will it keep working? The Republicans won’t get any overt help from Limbaugh, and why should they? As he has always said, his success “is not determined by who wins elections.” Without a single Republican in Congress, Limbaugh could count on a reliable daily audience – and the longer a controversy like this goes on, the more he can add to that audience. The tete-a-tete with the President also gives Limbaugh figurative weight, as if he really is a key thinker for conservative/Republican circles.

Truth be told, it’s more likely to be the other way around: Limbaugh is more likely to parrot GOP talking points than to devise his own platform for America. It’s not a matter of laziness, but of reality: he’s putting together a radio show, not a political movement.

Which raises an interesting point – as critical issues come before the federal government, why is the White House talking about a radio show blowhard? Aren’t there real issues they should be working on?

Bookmark and Share

Post Intelligencer, post-print

With news coming this week that the Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s print version may go the way of the Rocky Mountain News, we may be at the cusp of a new era in local news reporting.

The Post-Intelligencer (P-I) looks like it will shut down it’s printing presses and release an online-only version. Aside from printing and delivery, it means the P-I will also cut out reporter travel – national stories will be covered by wire services or by other sister papers in the Hearst network.

(Sidebar: Since it’s in the Hearst network, will the last printed word in the P-I have to be “rosebud”?)

There’s no dwindling market for local news, as the TV ratings show. But local daily newspapers are dinosaurs – slow-moving and cumbersome. The question is how the old media outlets adjust in a new media world. Will they see the online world as a way to stave off extinction for a few years, or will they find a way to evolve?

Chances are, the P-I – and other similar papers around the country – could do very well writing stories and posting them online. But why stop there? Online, they won’t be confined as they were on the printed page. They have multiple forms of media – audio, video, and everything in between – at their fingertips.

The dangerous trap here is thinking in terms of “media buckets” on a local level, as people have thought for decades: the TV stations are in the video bucket, the radio stations in the audio bucket, and the newspapers in the printed word bucket. There are no buckets online, so it doesn’t translate.

The end of the P-I’s print version isn’t necessarily an ending, but a liberation. The P-I can now combine printed stories about Seattle with short video news segments and podcasts. It can exist on its website as well as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Ning, and everywhere else. It can serve the people of Seattle, and be the authority on Seattle to everyone else.

The dinosaurs didn’t die out overnight, but eventually time caught up with most of them. Except for the smart ones; they learned to fly.

Bookmark and Share

Jim Eltringham at 30

“So here I am, getting older all the time / Looking older all the time / Feeling younger in my mind…” – Goldfinger

Today is my 30th birthday, and I’m pretty excited. To celebrate, today’s post isn’t about the White House, online media, message development, or anything else like that. Or, come to think of it, maybe it is about all that stuff, in a way.

Today, I’m sharing with you 30 lessons I’ve learned that have helped shape who I am as a person over the first three decades of my life. I’m not going to say I’ve always followed each one to the letter – but when I have, I’ve found I’m a lot happier:

30. Be nice to people on the way up – not because you’ll see them on the way down, but because it’s the right thing to do.

29. Try to keep your sense of humor. Laughing at the mundane speed bumps keeps you well-grounded.

28. The Beatles had it right: All you need is love. So did the Dave Matthews Band: Turns out, it’s not where but who you’re with that really matters.

27. The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live.

26. To-do lists are effective; and prioritized to-do lists are even better. But make sure your priorities are in order.

25. A job is never really yours until you’re ready to leave it.

24. Ideas don’t have consequences. Actions have consequences.

23. It’s important to be honest with others, but even more important – and sometimes more difficult – to be honest with yourself.

22. In recreational sports, play hard but don’t take it too seriously.

21. Your best friends will be your best friends through an awful lot. But don’t abuse that, because everyone has a limit.

20. Good things come to those who wait – but only what’s left from those who hustle.

19. State education may not be considered the best schooling, but it’s the best education. And the nuns… well, don’t get me started.

18. Government shouldn’t force you to love thy neighbor, and in reality they can’t. You should already be doing that on your own.

17. “Kites rise highest against the wind – not with it.” – Winston Churchill

16. If you can ever work from home, do it.

15. Appreciate your surroundings.

14. “Toil is good for the soul.” – Dan Klenck

13. My Mom was right about just about everything.

12. If you hold on tight to what you think is your thing you may find you’re missing all the rest.

11. Viewing yourself through others’ eyes can be a useful exercise but a dangerous habit.

10. Pray as if it all depended on God, but work as if it all depended on you.

9. If you ever need to get pumped up – for a new job or any other endeavor – a viewing of the Mighty Ducks is just what the doctor ordered.

8. Fear, anger, and aggression are the ways of the Dark Side.

7. Come to think of it, my Dad was right about just about everything, too.

6. Follow your gut. Where I have regrets, it’s usually because I over-thought things; I’m not nearly as regretful about times I’ve followed instincts that proved to be wrong.

5. In every crisis, there are elements of danger – and elements of opportunity.

4. There are such things as guardian angels.

3. In tough times, you have to keep smiling and dare the world to knock that smile off your face. And when it tries to do just that, you have to smile wider.

2. Family comes first.

1. This one just hit me this morning: You’re only old when you wake up in the morning and feel like your best days are behind you. If you wake up every day feeling like you are about to embark on a new adventure, you will always be young – no matter how long ago you were born or how sore your body is.

I hope you have a very happy March 5, 2009!

Bookmark and Share

Girl Scouts 2.0

The Girl Scouts understand two concepts which have escaped the people at the controls of the economy: supply and demand.

The Girl Scouts of America have announced sweeping changes in order to boost membership. Recognizing that this isn’t 1955 anymore, the concepts of campfire sing-a-longs, sewing and cooking, and even merit badges are being replaced by video conferences, financial responsibility training, and a leadership development curriculum. With more girls socializing online, blogs and online networks are emphasized (which gives the Girl Scouts a chance to teach about online safety, too).

Breathe easy, those peanut-butter-and-chocolate cookies aren’t going anywhere.

Of course it’s sad when traditions are phased out, but the Girl Scouts are reacting to the reality of dwindling membership – the organization was forced to change to meet the needs and demands of today. By clinging to those traditions, the Girl Scouts could serve nostalgia-seekers, but not the young girls who need them – and they would slowly die out.

Any industry seeking a bailout should heed the example of the Girl Scouts. And if the parallels aren’t readily clear, maybe they could go door to door selling thin mints for a week or so – apparently, you can pick up pretty sound economic lessons that way.

Bookmark and Share

They were going to call it O-Tube, but that sounds dirty

The weekly White House “YouTube” addresses aren’t going to be on YouTube anymore. Instead, the videos will be hosted by a customized player. In the absence of a formal explanation, some are suggesting conflicts over YouTube’s privacy policies.

As Cnet chronicles, the White House has been under criticism since the beginning for choosing Google-owned YouTube as its video hosting platform. The change may silence criticism of the White House, but it won’t solve any of the root privacy concerns circling around Google and YouTube.

Could the White House have used its bully pulpit to make YouTube more secure? It certainly would have been a better service to internet users – after all, the folks who follow the President’s weekly addresses probably view hundreds of other videos on YouTube as well. President Obama could have been vocal in calling on YouTube to change its policies to better serve its users.

Of course, it may not be about privacy. YouTube is more than just a video site – it is an online community. The President’s Weekly Address is just one of millions of videos; and being on a site like YouTube invites comments and video responses. Maybe YouTube is too public a forum; perhaps the White House is unwilling to sacrifice their message monopoly to engage in a legitimate back-and-forth debate.

Bookmark and Share

PETA wanted me to starve yesterday

Create Your Own Sea Kitten at peta.org!

I try to be a good Catholic – which, as part of my faith, means not eating meat on Fridays during Lent. (No, wait, no meat on Fridays, period. No, no, just during Lent…) Anyway, I couldn’t eat meat yesterday, at least not land-meat. Fish was ok, in the eyes of the Church – but not, apparently, in the eyes of PETA, who have launched a new campaign to save the fish.

Their tongue-in-cheek view is that the reason people are so callous toward fishing is that the name “fish” is so unappealing. So PETA has renamed them “sea kittens.” Because kittens are cute and cuddly, get it?

In the political landscape, PETA is something of a mixed blessing. Silly campaigns like the Sea Kittens and Kentucky Fried Cruelty underscore their status as a fringe group, and demonstrate the left’s lack of common sense. And, since some nutcases are willing to send them money, they soak up resources that could be devoted to ideas that have a better chance of cracking the mainstream. However, groups like PETA also allow more mainstream liberals to distance themselves from the radical thought that serves as their philosophical foundation.

In other words, President Obama may be talking about a radical overhaul of the best health care system in the world – but hey, at least he’s not as crazy as those sea kitten whack-jobs, right?

(By the way – yesterday’s lunch was sushi. Meow.)

Bookmark and Share

Jin-ed up?

Without mentioning him once, Governor Bobby Jindal went a long way toward recapturing the formula for Republican success which Ronald Reagan first captured nearly three decades ago.

Despite widespread criticism – even among Republican voices – his response to the unofficial State of the Union address last night struck the right tone for the GOP moving forward.

Unlike the gaggle of 2008 GOP hopefuls who felt they could excite their base by bandying about buzzwords like “conservative” and limited government,” Jindal illustrated the conservative view of government with stories. He recounted his commiseration with a local (Democrat) sheriff when federal bureaucrats stood in the way of Katrina rescue efforts. He talked about stimulating Louisiana’s economy by cutting taxes and promoting business. He talked about reforming education to empower people.

(Incidentally, in one of the poignant lines of his speech, Jindal even took back Katrina – the issue that served as an illustration for Democrats’ accusations that George W. Bush had lost touch with America. Jindal turned it around: “Today in Washington, some of us are promising that government will rescue us from the economic storms… those of us who lived through Katrina — we have our doubts.”)

Most importantly, Gov. Bobby Jindal talked more about what he was for than what he was against. The running theme of his speech was a line he got from his Dad: “Americans can do anything.”

And in that optimistic wisdom is the conservative message. We oppose bigger government not only because it doesn’t work, but because it imposes restrictions that take away the ability for Americans to use their own ingenuity and creativity to solve problems – a formula that has worked for 233 years and counting.

It isn’t enough to say it – voters need to see it. Which is why Governors like Bobby Jindal are still the best torch-bearers for a renewed GOP brand. And while the detractors on the right – who were likely looking for their own version of a “conservative Obama” pan his speech, they must remember that one person will not resurrect the party.

Bobby Jindal is a piece of a much bigger puzzle. For the Republican party to establish consistent electoral victories, they need to paint a picture of a positive party with answers – and like a puzzle, creating that picture requires multiple parts.

Bookmark and Share

EXCLUSIVE: Preview of tonight’s comments on the stimulus

Okay, maybe President Obama won’t shed the Washington Blue Suit Uniform for Matthew Lesko’s “I want to be the Riddler in Batman III” duds. But Mr. “Free Money for Everyone!” has been paying attention to the legislation passed by President, uh, “Free Money for Everyone!” – and he’s already trying to make money off it, as reported by Mitchell Blatt.

(Of course, Lesko doesn’t report that you can get your own stimulus check from the Bank of Obama.)

More interesting to me will be the tone the President takes tonight. Early reports indicate that the speech will be more forward-looking than his steady drumbeat of sour economic predictions that began before his inauguration; some have called on Obama to sound more positive.

(It will also be interesting to note whether “forward-looking” will mean more jabs at the previous administration; my money is on “yes.”)

From its President, the country sure could use some good news. But politics is about managing expectations – so the more dire the current economic situation appears to be, the more credit Obama can take when the economy ticks back upward in a few years – likely just in time for his re-election.

It’s a little like Groundhog Day (the holiday, not the movie): if during tonight’s speech, the President sees a shadow, it means four more years of campaigning-by-governing.

Bookmark and Share