It’s a story that deals with higher taxes, government largess, and an agency that broke it’s promises.
Is it the current budget battle? The raging debate over Obamacare? The rallying cry for state public sector unions? No, it’s Spring Concert at my alma mater, UMass. This year, for the first time ever, students will have to pay to attend.
In light of the current debate over the size and scope of government spending, this tale is sort of interesting.
Some background: UMass’s annual Spring Concert dates back to at least the 1960s. It used to be an outdoor event on the vast expanse of space right in the middle of campus; since 1999 it has been held in the Mullins Center (which also hosts basketball, hockey, and other concerts). The money to put on the concert comes from the student activities fund, which is charged along with tuition and other fees to each student on their bill each semester – essentially, a tax that funds student government activities. The article points out that the fee is now $94 (it was in the $70 range when I was there) and includes a good description of the funding process and the way the Spring Concert is put together.
Controversy and disappointment are nothing new for the Spring Concert; the 1998 show (during my freshman year on campus) was scrapped because the agency in charge couldn’t scrape together enough funds after running other concerts throughout the year. This year, the problem is that the $200,000 special fund that was set aside specifically for the concert (an outgrowth from the ’98 cancellation) isn’t enough to cover the talent and other costs.
In other words, a government agency is having trouble paying its bills, and is looking for taxpayers to make up the difference.
Especially telling is explanation offered by the advisor for University Productions and Concerts, the group in charge of the event:
“One of the problems is that we are a very spoiled campus,” said Lloyd Henley, associate director of the Center for Student Development and faculty advisor to the UPC. “We are used to such top-caliber artists, and so one of the things I said to UPC and the SGA is, ‘Something’s got to break.’”
Met with the dilemma of the high costs of talent and a budget which sounds big but probably goes quick when running an event of this size, Henley’s advice was apparently to charge more on top of what people were already paying – because the students/taxpayers are “spoiled” and the Spring Concert has to be a great show rather than a good free concert. It’s not surprising; despite the “faculty” advisor moniker Henley’s position within the office that oversees campus activities gives him away as an administrative/bureaucratic figure. In fact, some folks are calling for increases in student activities fees so that the shortfall doesn’t happen again in future year. Because why shouldn’t a state school raise its fees to accommodate a really big concert?
It’s both sad and fortunate that the voice of reason comes from a student:
This past year, fees did not increase and, according to Josh Davidson, chairman of the SGA’s Ways and Mean Committee, they should stay the same until the budget process is modified.
“I really feel that we can spend the money a whole lot better,” he said. “The way that we allocate money to groups can be much more effective. I would like to see those things happen before we raise the fees.”
That’s a good philosophy, no matter what level of government you’re in.