Gaian dictator?

“When will people learn: Democracy doesn’t work!” – Homer Simpson (a Barack Obama voter)

A bunch of scientists got together and determined that a single multi-billionaire could probably fund a project to combat climate change by spraying sulfur particles in the atmosphere. It is, of course, controversial even among scientist; some theorize that this “solution” may destroy the ozone layer. (“Egon, this reminds me of that time you tried to drill a hole in your head.”)

But beyond the technical challenges, talk turned to what practical issues would arise in building a global consensus for any such undertaking. As New Scientist correspondent Fred Pearce reported:

“Some enthusiasts for geo-engineering – or eco-hacking, as some have taken to calling it – said we might one day have to ignore democratic niceties in order to get the job done.

Democratic processes are not “niceties” – they are government systems that prevent oppression.

Environmentalists may make the argument that Homer Simpson made – that ignoring the will of the people may be necessary to follow a path that promotes an overall good for mankind. But considering that they can’t even agree on which path that is, let’s not burn the Constitution just yet.

Buy More Science!

ScienceDebate2008.com is a group of scientific research groups, trade organizations, academic institutions, and similar groups that invites site visitors to submit science-related questions, which are then posed to the candidates. Obama has answered, and drawn glowing praise.

Quoted on Wired.com, ScienceDebate CEO Shawn Otto called his responses “very substantive for this point in the campaign, and surprisingly detailed… A lot of the scientists I’ve spoken to are pleased with the level of substance and detail.”

What wisdom has Obama dispensed? Let’s look at some of his musings on science policy:
Read the full Q&A session here: http://www.sciencedebate2008.com/www/index.php?id=40

  • “My administration will increase funding for basic research in physical and life sciences, mathematics, and engineering at a rate that would double basic research budgets over the next decade.”
  • “I have proposed programs that, taken together, will increase federal investment in the clean energy research, development, and deployment to $150 billion over ten years.”
  • “As president, I will lift the current administration’s ban on federal funding of research on embryonic stem cell lines created after August 9, 2001 through executive order, and I will ensure that all research on stem cells is conducted ethically and with rigorous oversight.”

Notice a trend?

Putting aside the question of where the money would come from given the current state of our national finances, where would the money go to? Probably research groups, trade organizations, and academic institutions. I’m sure ScienceDebate2008.com partners, would get their share.

All in the name of science, of course.